From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keys v. Rozum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 1, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-5099 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 1, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-5099

08-01-2012

JAMAL KEYS v. GERALD ROZUM, et al.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 1 day of August, 2012, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and the Response thereto, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge L. Felipe Restrepo; it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED;

3. A certificate of appealability shall not issue in that, for reasons explained in the Report and Recommendation, a reasonable jurist could not conclude that the Court is incorrect in dismissing petitioner's aforementioned procedurally defaulted and otherwise barred claims, and since petitioner has not made the requisite showing of the denial of a constitutional right with regard to petitioner's remaining claims.

BY THE COURT

_____________________

BERLE M. SCHILLER, J.


Summaries of

Keys v. Rozum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 1, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-5099 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Keys v. Rozum

Case Details

Full title:JAMAL KEYS v. GERALD ROZUM, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 1, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-5099 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 1, 2012)