Keyes v. State

5 Citing cases

  1. Keyes v. State

    331 So. 3d 52 (Miss. Ct. App. 2021)

    After Keyes pleaded guilty and was sentenced as a habitual offender for these crimes, he filed multiple motions for post-conviction relief, all of which were denied. See, e.g.,Keyes , 549 So. 2d at 949 ; Keyes v. State , 918 So. 2d 76 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005) ; Keyes v. State , 281 So. 3d 40 (Miss. Ct. App. 2019) ; Keyes v. State , 304 So. 3d 637 (Miss. Ct. App. 2020).

  2. Wilkerson v. State

    307 So. 3d 1231 (Miss. Ct. App. 2020)   Cited 5 times

    Three of the four cases were decided prior to our holding in Walton , and in the fourth case, we merely held that the petitioner failed "to show that the State suppressed material evidence," and therefore, "his claim regarding an alleged Brady violation fai[ed]." Keyes v. State , 281 So. 3d 40, 42 (¶15) (Miss. Ct. App. 2019). ¶32.

  3. Jones v. State

    307 So. 3d 486 (Miss. Ct. App. 2020)

    The good or bad faith of the prosecution is irrelevant. Keyes v. State , 281 So. 3d 40, 42 (¶14) (Miss. Ct. App. 2019). ¶48.

  4. Keyes v. State

    304 So. 3d 637 (Miss. Ct. App. 2020)   Cited 3 times
    Finding that the defendant waived any contention regarding her habitual-offender status where she knowingly and voluntarily entered her plea as a habitual offender and did not challenge the sufficiency of her prior convictions in any way

    See Keyes v. State , 549 So. 2d 949 (Miss. 1989) ; Keyes v. State , 918 So. 2d 76 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005) ; Order, Keyes v. State , No. 25CI1:13-cv-00796 (Hinds County, Miss., Cir. Ct. Oct. 9, 2013); Keyes v. State , 281 So. 3d 40 (Miss. Ct. App. 2019). The court sentenced Keyes to serve as follows:

  5. Easterling v. State

    281 So. 3d 243 (Miss. Ct. App. 2019)   Cited 4 times
    In Easterling v. State, 281 So. 3d 243, 250-51 (¶¶22, 25) (Miss. Ct. App. 2019), this Court declared that the defendant had "failed to present evidence of errors on the part of his initial counsel" based upon the fact that the defendant "claim[ed] that his prior counsel had failed to argue that [he] had not been afforded a translator" but had "made no mention of this [claim] in his personal affidavit and provided no independent supporting affidavits for this contention."

    This waiver can operate to bar even flaws of a constitutional magnitude. SeeKeyes v. State , No. 2017-CP-00712-COA, 281 So.3d 40, 42, 2019 WL 125708, at *2 (Miss. Ct. App. Jan. 8, 2019).¶36.