Thus, we cannot provide relief pursuant to our certiorari jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.100(c)(1) ; City of Key West Tree Comm'n v. Havlicek, 20 So.3d 904 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). Nevertheless, as the argument for a writ of certiorari parallels those for a writ of prohibition in the other three petitions, we treat the petition as such.
After the parties filed their briefs, this Court filed its opinion, granting the Tree Commission's writ of certiorari and quashing the circuit court's order granting certiorari. See City of Key West Tree Comm'n v. Havlicek, 20 So.3d 904 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). This Court held that the circuit court had no jurisdiction to review an oral order, and found that "[b]ased on the Magistrate's comments at the hearing, the Magistrate's view may have been that if the Magistrate conducts a trial de novo, then the claim of error before the Tree Commission is immaterial."