From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Key v. Walker

United States District Court, N.D. California
Apr 6, 2010
No. C 06-4199 CRB (PR) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2010)

Opinion

No. C 06-4199 CRB (PR).

April 6, 2010


ORDER


(Docket # 28 29)

Per order filed on December 15, 2009, the court granted petitioner's motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal and an application for a certificate of appealability (COA). On January 14, 2010, petitioner filed a timely notice of appeal (docket #28 at 8) and, on January 28, 2010, he filed a timely application for a COA.

Petitioner's application for a COA (docket #29) is DENIED because petitioner has not made "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Petitioner has not demonstrated that "reasonable jurists would find the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

The clerk shall terminate all pending motions as moot (see docket #28) and forward to the court of appeals the case file with this order. See United States v. Asrar, 116 F.3d 1268, 1270 (9th Cir. 1997).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Key v. Walker

United States District Court, N.D. California
Apr 6, 2010
No. C 06-4199 CRB (PR) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2010)
Case details for

Key v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL KEY, JR., Petitioner, v. JAMES WALKER, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Apr 6, 2010

Citations

No. C 06-4199 CRB (PR) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2010)

Citing Cases

Sands v. Lewis

However, there is no clearly established Supreme Court precedent holding that a violation of the Act may…