From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kevorkian v. Peter Paul, Inc.

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Mar 5, 1985
488 A.2d 102 (Conn. App. Ct. 1985)

Opinion

(2210)

Argued January 8, 1985

Decision released March 5, 1985

Appeal by the defendants from a finding and award of the workers' compensation commissioner for the fifth district, brought to the compensation review division; decision affirming the finding and award, from which the defendants appealed to this court. No error.

Robert E. Beach, Jr., for the appellants (defendants).

Jeremiah Keefe, with whom, on the brief, was James E. Kernan, for the appellee (plaintiff).


We have carefully reviewed the record in this case and we find that the decision of the compensation review division is correct in law. General Statutes 31-301b. The finding did not include facts found without evidence nor did it fail to include material facts which are admitted or undisputed. Grady v. St. Mary's Hospital, 179 Conn. 662, 666, 427 A.2d 842 (1980); Wheat v. Red Star Express Lines, 156 Conn. 245, 248, 240 A.2d 859 (1968).


Summaries of

Kevorkian v. Peter Paul, Inc.

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Mar 5, 1985
488 A.2d 102 (Conn. App. Ct. 1985)
Case details for

Kevorkian v. Peter Paul, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT KEVORKIAN v. PETER PAUL, INC., ET AL

Court:Appellate Court of Connecticut

Date published: Mar 5, 1985

Citations

488 A.2d 102 (Conn. App. Ct. 1985)
3 Conn. App. 335

Citing Cases

Deleon v. Dunkin Donuts

Further, we have held that a period of specific indemnity may be interrupted where claimant is found to be…

DeBarros v. Singleton

See Bucko v. New London, 13 Conn. App. 566, 570, 537 A.2d 1045 (1988). The decision of the review division…