Opinion
October, 1913.
Present — Ingraham, P.J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Motion granted on terms stated in memorandum per curiam. Order to be settled on notice.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
KEVE v. COLUMBIA KID HAIR CURLERS MANUFACTURING
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1913
158 App. Div. 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)
Summaries of
KEVE v. COLUMBIA KID HAIR CURLERS MANUFACTURING
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1913
158 App. Div. 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)
Case details for
KEVE v. COLUMBIA KID HAIR CURLERS MANUFACTURING
Case Details
Full title:Max Keve v. Columbia Kid Hair Curlers Manufacturing Company
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Oct 1, 1913
Citations
158 App. Div. 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)