Kettner v. Snow

1 Citing case

  1. Diehl Lumber Transp. Inc. v. Mickelson

    802 P.2d 739 (Utah Ct. App. 1990)   Cited 6 times
    Stating that a nunc pro tunc order "may not be used to correct the court's failure to speak"

    Id. 405 N.W.2d at 675 (citations omitted). Similarly, in Kettner v. Snow, 13 Utah 2d 382, 375 P.2d 28, 30 (1962), our supreme court held that using nunc pro tunc power, clerical errors may be corrected or omissions supplied so the record will accurately reflect that which in fact took place.