From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ketchmore v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 10, 2021
199 A.D.3d 1150 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

533088

11-10-2021

In the Matter of Aaron Q. KETCHMORE, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Aaron Q. Ketchmore, Elmira, petitioner pro se. Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu of counsel), for respondent.


Aaron Q. Ketchmore, Elmira, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Aarons, Pritzker, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Colangelo, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. After an incarcerated individual was observed with a five-inch laceration to his neck, the ensuing investigation, that included confidential information, resulted in petitioner being charged in a misbehavior report with assault, creating a disturbance, smuggling, violent conduct and possessing a weapon. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found not guilty of smuggling, but guilty of the remaining charges. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, hearing testimony and confidential testimony considered by the Hearing Officer provide substantial evidence supporting the finding of guilt (see Matter of Mendez v. Annucci, 155 A.D.3d 1146, 1147, 62 N.Y.S.3d 833 [2017] ; Matter of Mears v. Venettozzi, 150 A.D.3d 1498, 1499, 54 N.Y.S.3d 219 [2017], lv denied 30 N.Y.3d 905, 2017 WL 5492211 [2017] ). Contrary to petitioner's assertion, the Hearing Officer's confidential interview with the correction officer who conducted the investigation and authored the misbehavior report was sufficiently detailed to independently assess the reliability of the confidential information (see Matter of Ortiz v. Annucci, 163 A.D.3d 1383, 1384, 80 N.Y.S.3d 746 [2018] ; Matter of Johansel v. Annucci, 155 A.D.3d 1147, 1148, 62 N.Y.S.3d 836 [2017] ). Finally, petitioner's denial of his involvement in the incident presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Spencer v. Annucci, 179 A.D.3d 1372, 1373, 117 N.Y.S.3d 745 [2020] ; Matter of Jones v. Annucci, 156 A.D.3d 1093, 1094, 65 N.Y.S.3d 480 [2017] ).

Egan Jr., J.P., Aarons, Pritzker, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Colangelo, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Ketchmore v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 10, 2021
199 A.D.3d 1150 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Ketchmore v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Aaron Q. KETCHMORE, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 10, 2021

Citations

199 A.D.3d 1150 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
199 A.D.3d 1150

Citing Cases

Kelly v. Mayes

We confirm. Contrary to petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report, related documentation, testimony at…

Slater v. Annucci

The misbehavior report authored by the correction officer who conducted the cell search, the papers and other…