From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ketchikan Retail Liquor Dealers v. State

Supreme Court of Alaska
May 6, 1980
615 P.2d 1391 (Alaska 1980)

Summary

holding that a party's failure to designate a record to support the party's claims justifies a reviewing court in deciding those claims against the party

Summary of this case from Bertilson v. State

Opinion

No. 3697.

May 6, 1980.

Before RABINOWITZ, C.J., and CONNOR, BOOCHEVER and BURKE, JJ.


ORDER

On consideration of the petition for rehearing filed November 19, 1979, and the response to the petition filed March 26, 1980,

IT IS ORDERED:

The petition for rehearing is granted for the limited purpose of amending opinion 1963 filed November 9, 1979 ( 602 P.2d 434). On page 439, footnote 15, in the first line of the second paragraph, the words "with disapproval" are stricken.

In all other respects, the petition for rehearing is denied.

RABINOWITZ, C.J., dissents, and would grant the petition for rehearing in its entirety.

MATTHEWS, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Ketchikan Retail Liquor Dealers v. State

Supreme Court of Alaska
May 6, 1980
615 P.2d 1391 (Alaska 1980)

holding that a party's failure to designate a record to support the party's claims justifies a reviewing court in deciding those claims against the party

Summary of this case from Bertilson v. State
Case details for

Ketchikan Retail Liquor Dealers v. State

Case Details

Full title:KETCHIKAN RETAIL LIQUOR DEALERS ASSOCIATIONS, HERB CHAMBERS AND WILLIAM…

Court:Supreme Court of Alaska

Date published: May 6, 1980

Citations

615 P.2d 1391 (Alaska 1980)

Citing Cases

Tolotta v. State

Tolotta has failed to meet this burden, and we decline his invitation to notice a purported error based on…

Rollins v. State, Municip. of Anchorage

Statutory headings, however, are not part of the law. AS 01.05.006; Ketchikan Retail Liquor Dealers…