Summary
In Kessler v. The Ansonia (253 N.Y. 453) we dealt with the question of liability, on the part of the owner of an apartment house, for injury done to personal property stored in the rooms of a tenant, through the escape of steam from radiators designed to heat the rooms.
Summary of this case from Kirshenbaum v. General Outdoor Adv. Co.Opinion
Argued April 2, 1930
Decided May 6, 1930
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
Robert J. Sykes, Paul Bonynge and Daniel A. Dorsey for appellant.
Emanuel Sustick for respondent.
The plaintiff, under a written lease, occupied an apartment in a building owned by the defendant. In a living room of the apartment she had stored valuable furniture, paintings and rugs. The room was isolated from the remainder of the apartment by doors which were at all times closed. On a certain morning, a pipe, supplying steam to a radiator in the living room, burst, with the result that steam, escaping in great volume, did serious damage to the personal property stored. In the absence of any explanation, it was the reasonable inference, arising from the explosion, without further proof, that the steam pipe was defective, and, therefore, that the defendant was negligent. A repairman, sent to the apartment by the management, reported to the plaintiff that he could do nothing "as the pipes are old and rusty." Nothing was done, although the defendant had been given timely warning and knew of the defective piping. Therefore, the clause of the lease exempting the defendant from liability for damage caused by the leakage of steam did not apply. That clause means simply "that the landlord is not to be liable for damages caused by wear and tear, or inherent defects, or the action of the elements, although by the exercise of active vigilance he might have prevented such damages; but it does not exempt him from his liability to repair actual defects, when called to his attention, or from acts of affirmative negligence." (Per Mr. Justice LEHMAN in Drescher Rothberg Co. v. Landeker, 140 N.Y. Supp. 1025.)
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN and HUBBS, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed.