Kessler v. City of Phoenix

Full title: Bernard KESSLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF PHOENIX; Roxanne Song…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 20, 2001

14 F. App'x 921 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion

14 Fed.Appx. 921 (9th Cir. 2001) Bernard KESSLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF PHOENIX; Roxanne Song Ong, Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-16040. D.C. No. CV-97-00669-EHC. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. July 20, 2001

Submitted July 9, 2001. ^*

* The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Kessler's request for oral argument is denied.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Citizen brought action against city. The United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Earl H. Carroll, J., dismissed. Citizen appealed the denial of motions for preliminary injunctions. The Court of Appeals held that appeal was moot.

Dismissed.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Earl H. Carroll, District Judge, Presiding.

Before KOZINSKI, T.G. NELSON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM ^**

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Bernard Kessler appeals pro se from the district court's order denying his motions for preliminary injunctions. Kessler's appeal is moot because Kessler only appeals the preliminary injunction decisions in an action the district court has entirely dismissed through entry of final judgment. See Taylor v. United States, 181 F.3d 1017, 1022-23 (9th Cir.1999).

DISMISSED.