From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kesnel v. Napolitano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION SEC. P
Feb 9, 2012
DOCKET NO. 11-1645 (W.D. La. Feb. 9, 2012)

Opinion

DOCKET NO. 11-1645

02-09-2012

EMANUEL KESNEL v. JANET NAPOLITANO, ET AL


JUDGE James T. Trimble, Jr.


MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES D. KIRK


JUDGMENT

There being no objection to the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge previously filed herein, the Court concludes that the proposed findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law.

Additionally, the Court notes the copy of the report and recommendation mailed December 20, 2011 to Mr. Kesnel's last known address was returned to the Clerk of Court on January 03, 2012, marked "return to sender". More than thirty days have passed since January 03, 2012, but no correction to Plaintiff's address has been received by the Court. Therefore, dismissal for failure to prosecute under Local Rule 41.3W and Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is also appropriate. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 8) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

SIGNED on this 9th day of February, 2012, at Alexandria, Louisiana.

__________________

James T. Trimble, Jr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Kesnel v. Napolitano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION SEC. P
Feb 9, 2012
DOCKET NO. 11-1645 (W.D. La. Feb. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Kesnel v. Napolitano

Case Details

Full title:EMANUEL KESNEL v. JANET NAPOLITANO, ET AL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION SEC. P

Date published: Feb 9, 2012

Citations

DOCKET NO. 11-1645 (W.D. La. Feb. 9, 2012)