Such an acceptance under N.Y.U.C.C. § 2-606(1) occurred here. See Kesco Textile Co. v. Coit Int'l, Inc., 41 A.D.2d 828, 343 N.Y.S.2d 1, 3 (1973), aff'd, 34 N.Y.2d 700, 356 N.Y.S.2d 616, 313 N.E.2d 74 (1974); In re Fran Char Press, 55 B.R. 55, 57 (Bkrtcy.E.D.N.Y. 1985) (buyer "accepted" posters where buyer took possession of posters and mounted them on cardboard); Syntex Corp., 786 F.2d at 75; Economy Forms Corp. v. Kandy, Inc., 391 F.Supp. 944, 950 (N.D.Ga. 1974), aff'd 511 F.2d 1400 (5th Cir. 1975). § 2-606.

Continuous use of goods by a buyer can constitute acceptance. See, e.g., Hooper Handling, Inc. v. Jonmark Corp., 267 A.D.2d 1075, 1076 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 1999) (buyer's use of shelving and mezzanine, despite initial complaints, constituted acceptance); Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Galloway, 195 A.D.2d 825, 826-27 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 1993) (buyer's continued retention and use of a boiler for "a substantial period of time, . . . despite plaintiff's offers to remove the boiler and credit her account," constituted acceptance); Kesco Textile Co. v. Coit Int'l, Inc., 41 A.D.2d 828, 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 1973) (buyer's use of polyester goods constituted acceptance), aff'd 313 N.E.2d 74 (N.Y. 1974); Sobiech v. Int'l Staple & Mach. Co., 867 F.2d 778, 781 (2d Cir. 1989) (buyer's control over machines for over three years constituted acceptance).

See Singer Co. v. Alka Knitting Mills, Inc., 41 A.D.2d 856, 343 N.Y.S.2d 146 (2d Dep't 1973). In Kesco Textile Company, Inc. v. Coit International, Inc., 41 A.D.2d 828, 343 N.Y.S.2d 1 (1st Dep't 1973), aff'd, 34 N.Y.2d 700, 356 N.Y.S.2d 616 (1974), a seller of textiles sued a buyer who complained of defects in the goods yet kept and used 126 of 312 pieces. The seller's offer to inspect the entire shipment for defects was refused by the buyer, who instead stored the goods claimed to be defective at the seller's expense.