From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kerzner v. Kerzner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 8, 2001
281 A.D.2d 215 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

March 8, 2001.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered February 10, 2000, which, inter alia, denied plaintiff wife's motion for an award of interim counsel fees in the amount of $50,0000, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Rina Kerzner, Pro Se.

Michael L. Paikin, for defendant-respondent.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Williams, Tom, Lerner, Rubin, JJ.


In view of the financial circumstances of the parties as documented before the court, disclosing, inter alia, that plaintiff has access to some $2 million from the sale of the former marital residence, the denial of plaintiff's motion for an award of interim counsel fees constituted a proper exercise of discretion (see, Mastrandrea v. Mastrandrea, 268 A.D.2d 293).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Kerzner v. Kerzner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 8, 2001
281 A.D.2d 215 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Kerzner v. Kerzner

Case Details

Full title:RINA KERZNER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. STUART KERZNER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 8, 2001

Citations

281 A.D.2d 215 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
726 N.Y.S.2d 388

Citing Cases

Steinberg v. Steinberg

Defendant, who was 33 at the time of the commencement of this action, has an MBA from Stanford and proven…