From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kertesz v. Feldheim

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 15, 1928
143 A. 917 (N.J. 1928)

Opinion

Argued May 17, 1928 —

Decided October 15, 1928.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 6 N.J. Mis. R. 8.

For the appellant, Isidor B. Glucksman.

For the respondent, Herman Waldman.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, MINTURN, BLACK, CAMPBELL, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 11.

For dismissal — PARKER, J. 1.


Summaries of

Kertesz v. Feldheim

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 15, 1928
143 A. 917 (N.J. 1928)
Case details for

Kertesz v. Feldheim

Case Details

Full title:ROSY KERTESZ, APPELLANT, v. JOSEPH FELDHEIM, RESPONDENT

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 15, 1928

Citations

143 A. 917 (N.J. 1928)
143 A. 917

Citing Cases

Roselle Park B. L. Assn. v. Friedlander

It is the settled rule in this jurisdiction that the action for use and occupation springs out of the…

Lizak v. Rottenbucher

The following cases are informative of the doctrine, its observance, and its qualifications: Claron v.…