From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kershaw-York v. Wolfinger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 2, 2003
309 A.D.2d 1229 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

CA 02-02249

October 2, 2003.

Appeal from so much of an order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (Gerace, J.), entered June 6, 2002, which, inter alia, granted the motion for summary judgment of defendants Harold H. Wolfinger, Jr., and Carl G. Clark, doing business as Clark and Wolfinger, dismissing the complaint against them, and granted in part defendant RAM Forest Products, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment.

BRIAN CHAPIN YORK, JAMESTOWN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT PRO SE, AND FOR KATHLEEN K. KERSHAW-YORK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

JOHN P. GULLO, II, FREDONIA, FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., HURLBUTT, GORSKI, AND LAWTON, JJ.


ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Gerace, J.


Summaries of

Kershaw-York v. Wolfinger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 2, 2003
309 A.D.2d 1229 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Kershaw-York v. Wolfinger

Case Details

Full title:KATHLEEN K. KERSHAW-YORK AND BRIAN CHAPIN YORK, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 2, 2003

Citations

309 A.D.2d 1229 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
765 N.Y.S.2d 536