From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kershaw v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 13, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00763-LJO-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00763-LJO-SKO PC

07-13-2012

JOSHUA AARON KERSHAW, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE


(Doc. 11)


THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Joshua Aaron Kershaw, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on May 11, 2011. On May 14, 2012, the Court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to complete and return the enclosed USM-285 forms and summonses within thirty days so that service of his complaint could be initiated. More than thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the order.

Accordingly, Plaintiff has thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order within which to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The failure to respond to this order will result in dismissal of this action, with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Kershaw v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 13, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00763-LJO-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Kershaw v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA AARON KERSHAW, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 13, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00763-LJO-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2012)