From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kerr v. Marshall Univ. Bd. of Governors

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 28, 2018
No. 17-2243 (4th Cir. Aug. 28, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-2243 No. 18-1195

08-28-2018

LISA MARIE KERR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARSHALL UNIVERSITY BOARD OF GOVERNORS; GENE BRETT KUHN; JUDITH SOUTHARD; SANDRA BAILEY; TERESA EAGLE; LISA HEATON; DAVID PITTENGER, Defendants - Appellees. LISA MARIE KERR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARSHALL UNIVERSITY BOARD OF GOVERNORS; GENE BRETT KUHN; JUDITH SOUTHARD; SANDRA BAILEY; TERESA EAGLE; LISA HEATON, and; DAVID PITTENGER, Defendants - Appellees.

Lisa Marie Kerr, Appellant Pro Se. John Andrew Hess, STEPTOE & JOHNSON PLLC, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Thomas E. Johnston, Chief District Judge. (2:14-cv-12333; 2:16-cv-06589) Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lisa Marie Kerr, Appellant Pro Se. John Andrew Hess, STEPTOE & JOHNSON PLLC, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Lisa Marie Kerr appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation and dismissing her July 2016 complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Kerr also appeals the district court's order denying her motion to reopen the judgment in her 2014 action, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), and for leave to amend her 2014 complaint, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kerr v. Marshall Univ. Bd. of Governors, No. 2:16-cv-06589 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 21, 2017); Kerr v. Marshall Univ. Bd. of Governors, No. 2:14-cv-12333 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 16, 2018). We deny Defendants' motion to deem frivolous Kerr's appeal in No. 17-2243 and deny Kerr's motion for sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Kerr v. Marshall Univ. Bd. of Governors

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 28, 2018
No. 17-2243 (4th Cir. Aug. 28, 2018)
Case details for

Kerr v. Marshall Univ. Bd. of Governors

Case Details

Full title:LISA MARIE KERR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARSHALL UNIVERSITY BOARD OF…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 28, 2018

Citations

No. 17-2243 (4th Cir. Aug. 28, 2018)

Citing Cases

Kerr v. Bailey

On August 28, 2018, the Fourth Circuit affirmed. Kerr v. Marshall Univ. Bd. of Governors, 735 Fed. App'x 827…