From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kerr v. Dunham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 4, 1994
201 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

February 4, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolf, Jr., J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Balio, Fallon, Doerr and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied and cross motion granted. Memorandum: Defendant failed to demonstrate special, unusual and extraordinary circumstances sufficient to authorize Supreme Court to permit defendant to conduct a physical examination of the injured plaintiff David A. Kerr more than five months after filing of the note of issue and statement of readiness (see, Laudico v. Sears, Roebuck Co., 125 A.D.2d 960; Levine v. McFarland, 98 A.D.2d 795, 796). Under the circumstances, Supreme Court should have denied defendant's motion and should have granted plaintiffs' cross motion for a protective order.


Summaries of

Kerr v. Dunham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 4, 1994
201 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Kerr v. Dunham

Case Details

Full title:DAVID A. KERR et al., Appellants, v. JO ANN DUNHAM, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 4, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
610 N.Y.S.2d 905