From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kerpa v. a a Brothers, Inc.

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Dec 22, 1987
534 A.2d 918 (Conn. App. Ct. 1987)

Opinion

(5406)

Argued December 17, 1987

Decision released December 22, 1987

Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as a result of the defendants' negligence, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Ansonia-Milford, and tried to the jury before Curran, J.; verdict and judgment for the plaintiff; thereafter, the court denied the plaintiff's motions to set aside the verdict and for additur, and the plaintiff appealed to this court. No error.

The appellant filed a motion for reargument en banc which was denied.

Gary Kerpa, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff).

Theodore R. Tyma, with whom, on the brief, was Paul V. McNamara, for the appellee (named defendant).


The plaintiff's first, second and sixth claims of error were not raised in the trial court; consequently, we will not consider those claims. The plaintiff's third, fourth and fifth claims of error invoke the discretionary function of the court. Our review of the record, transcript and briefs fails to disclose any abuse of such discretion.


Summaries of

Kerpa v. a a Brothers, Inc.

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Dec 22, 1987
534 A.2d 918 (Conn. App. Ct. 1987)
Case details for

Kerpa v. a a Brothers, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GARY KERPA v. A A BROTHERS, INC., ET AL

Court:Appellate Court of Connecticut

Date published: Dec 22, 1987

Citations

534 A.2d 918 (Conn. App. Ct. 1987)
13 Conn. App. 807

Citing Cases

Kerpa v. a a Brothers, Inc.

Decided April 5, 1988 The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 13…