From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kerner v. Kerner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 18, 1999
262 A.D.2d 1082 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

June 18, 1999

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J. — Vacate Judgment.

PRESENT: LAWTON, J. P., HAYES, WISNER, HURLBUTT AND SCUDDER, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We exercise our discretion to treat the appeal, taken from the decision, as taken from the order (see, CPLR 5520 [c]; Progressive Ins. Co. v. Rudd Spray Serv., 236 A.D.2d 874). Supreme Court properly denied defendant's motion for postjudgment relief. Insofar as the motion may be viewed as one pursuant to CPLR 4404 (b), we conclude that it was untimely (see, CPLR 4405; Casey v. Slattery, 213 A.D.2d 890, 891; Bertan v. Richmond Mem. Hosp. Health Ctr., 131 A.D.2d 799, 800-801). Insofar as the motion may be viewed as one to vacate the judgment pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (2), we conclude that it was improperly predicated upon evidence available at trial and upon posttrial events. "Only evidence which was in existence but undiscoverable with due diligence at the time of judgment may be characterized as newly discovered evidence" (Matter of Commercial Structures v. City of Syracuse, 97 A.D.2d 965, 966).


Summaries of

Kerner v. Kerner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 18, 1999
262 A.D.2d 1082 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Kerner v. Kerner

Case Details

Full title:COREY L. KEENER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT KEENER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 1082 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
691 N.Y.S.2d 847

Citing Cases

Southern v. Southern

In any event, the mother is not entitled to relief pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(2). She failed to show that the…

Southern v.

In any event, the mother is not entitled to relief pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(2). She failed to show that the…