From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kern v. Tex. Optometry Bd.

Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
Dec 1, 2014
No. 07-14-00049-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 1, 2014)

Opinion

No. 07-14-00049-CV

12-01-2014

BRIAN KERN, O.D., PETER M. HO, M.D., D/B/A TEXAS VISION ASSOCIATES, P.A. AND MING-TAO HO, M.D., A/K/A "PETER" M. HO, M.D., APPELLANTS v. THE TEXAS OPTOMETRY BOARD, ET AL., APPELLEES


On Appeal from the 99th District Court Lubbock County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2013-508,829; Honorable William C. Sowder, Presiding

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

Appellants, Brian Kern, O.D. and Peter M. Ho, M.D., P.A., d/b/a Texas Vision Associates, P.A., and Ming-Tao Ho, M.D., a/k/a "Peter" M. Ho, M.D., filed Appellants' Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of this appeal on November 25, 2014. The motion includes a certificate of conference indicating that counsel for Appellees does not oppose the relief requested. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). The motion does not indicate an agreement of the parties with regard to the allocation of costs of the appeal. We therefore tax costs of the appeal against Appellants. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d).

Having dismissed the appeal at the request of Appellants, we will not entertain a motion for rehearing, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Patrick A. Pirtle

Justice


Summaries of

Kern v. Tex. Optometry Bd.

Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
Dec 1, 2014
No. 07-14-00049-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 1, 2014)
Case details for

Kern v. Tex. Optometry Bd.

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN KERN, O.D., PETER M. HO, M.D., D/B/A TEXAS VISION ASSOCIATES, P.A…

Court:Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

Date published: Dec 1, 2014

Citations

No. 07-14-00049-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 1, 2014)