From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kern v. Star Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
Jun 4, 2015
Case No. 3:15-cv-15 (D.N.D. Jun. 4, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:15-cv-15 Case No. 3:15-cv-24

06-04-2015

Victor M. Kern, Plaintiff, v. Star Bank, Verndale, MN, First National Bank, Wadena, MN, Wadena County Sheriff, Defendants. Victor M. Kern, Plaintiff, v. Steven K. Ma[r]den Law Office, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the court has received a Report and Recommendation from the Honorable Alice R. Senechal, United States Magistrate Judge, in each of the above-captioned cases. The Report and Recommendation recommends that both cases be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and that the motions be dismissed as moot. Plaintiff Victor Kern has filed 16 pages of objections. The objections cover a variety of topics. For example, Kern seeks to re-raise issues addressed in other lawsuits; asserts that it is unconstitutional to regulate his revenue and expansion of his company, to market his patent, and to alter the mail route; alleges that he has "witnessed other false articles" implying it was improper for the magistrate judge to rely on a public obituary of Mr. Marden; alleges that there are "sweet deals" and "the buddy system" that permits individuals in Wadena to obtain land; and, among other things, recites numerous "facts" and asserts claims regarding government corruptions and complaints to the Minnesota Attorney General's Office. None of Kern's objections cure the problems identified in the Report and Recommendation - that is, the court is unable to (1) discern the particular causes of action Kern is attempting to allege, and (2) whether this court has subject matter and/or personal jurisdiction over such claims.

Doc. #10, Case No. 3:15-cv-15; Doc. #8, Case No. 3:15-cv-24

Because Kern has failed to state a comprehensible claim that may entitled him to relief in this court, the court finds the magistrate judge's analyses and recommendations are appropriate. The court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation filed in each of these cases in its entirety. For the reasons set forth therein, the complaints are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice and the motions in Case No. 3:15-cv-15 are DISMISSED as moot.

The court finds that any appeal would be frivolous, cannot be taken in good faith, and may not be taken in forma pauperis.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated this 4th day of June, 2015.

/s/ Ralph R. Erickson

Ralph R. Erickson, Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Kern v. Star Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
Jun 4, 2015
Case No. 3:15-cv-15 (D.N.D. Jun. 4, 2015)
Case details for

Kern v. Star Bank

Case Details

Full title:Victor M. Kern, Plaintiff, v. Star Bank, Verndale, MN, First National…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 4, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:15-cv-15 (D.N.D. Jun. 4, 2015)

Citing Cases

Kern v. Dept. of Justice

These references to multiple defendants are likely born from Plaintiff copying from his other documents used…