From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kepple v. J. Hill Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 7, 2000
275 A.D.2d 299 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

August 7, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated October 8, 1998, as, upon reargument, adhered to a prior order of the same court dated April 27, 1998, granting the defendants' respective motions to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126 for failure to comply with a conditional order of dismissal of the same court (LeVine, J.), dated July 17, 1997.

O'Brien, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Altman, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

As a consequence of the plaintiff's failure to comply with a conditional order of dismissal, that order became absolute ( see, Tirone v. Staten Is. Univ. Hosp., 264 A.D.2d 415; Askenazi v. Hymil Mfg. Co., 263 A.D.2d 443). To be relieved from the adverse impact of the order of dismissal, the plaintiff had to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for her failure to timely comply with the discovery demands, and the existence of a meritorious cause of action ( see, Barriga v. Sapo, 250 A.D.2d 795; Michaud v. City of New York, 242 A.D.2d 369; Cobble Hill Nursing Home v. Griffo, 240 A.D.2d 459). The plaintiff did not meet this burden, and therefore dismissal of the action was proper.


Summaries of

Kepple v. J. Hill Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 7, 2000
275 A.D.2d 299 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Kepple v. J. Hill Associates

Case Details

Full title:FLORENCE KEPPLE, Appellant, v. J. HILL ASSOCIATES et al., Defendants and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 7, 2000

Citations

275 A.D.2d 299 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
712 N.Y.S.2d 405

Citing Cases

Williams v. New Style Limousine, Inc.

To add insult to injury, after flaunting four Court orders, defendant Masih was "convinced" to appear for the…

Williams v. NEW LIMOUSINE

To add insult to injury, after flaunting four court orders, defendant Masih was "convinced" to appear for the…