From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keo v. Marin Cnty.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Oct 24, 2022
22-cv-05317-TLT (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-05317-TLT

10-24-2022

CHANHT REATREY KEO, Plaintiff, v. MARIN COUNTY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED

RE: DKT. NO. 12

TRINA L. THOMPSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On October 7, 2022, Defendant, City of San Rafael, filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim against Defendant upon which relief can be granted. See ECF 12. Plaintiffs response or opposition to the motion was due by October 21, 2022. Plaintiff did not file a response or opposition by the deadline.

Given Plaintiff's failure to oppose the motion by the deadline, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to show cause why Defendant's motion should not be granted. Plaintiff shall file a statement of no more than two pages by November 4, 2022. If Plaintiff wishes to oppose the motion, Plaintiff must also file his opposition by that date. If Plaintiff files an opposition to which Defendant wishes to reply, Defendant may file any reply by November 18, 2022.

Accordingly, the November 15, 2022, motion hearing is hereby vacated and will be reset by the Court if necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Keo v. Marin Cnty.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Oct 24, 2022
22-cv-05317-TLT (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Keo v. Marin Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:CHANHT REATREY KEO, Plaintiff, v. MARIN COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Oct 24, 2022

Citations

22-cv-05317-TLT (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2022)