From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kentz v. Smith

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 15, 2006
No. 1:04cv-06066-REC-LJO-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2006)

Opinion

No. 1:04cv-06066-REC-LJO-P.

February 15, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 29) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 28)


Plaintiff Charles Lowell Kentz ("plaintiff") is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On January 4, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30) days. On January 18, 2006, plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed January 4, 2006, is ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, filed December 27, 2005, is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kentz v. Smith

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 15, 2006
No. 1:04cv-06066-REC-LJO-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2006)
Case details for

Kentz v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES LOWELL KENTZ, Plaintiff, v. EARLENE SMITH, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 15, 2006

Citations

No. 1:04cv-06066-REC-LJO-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2006)