From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kent v. Brune

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 26, 1989
776 P.2d 882 (Or. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

A8601-00570; CA A48711

Argued and submitted May 31, 1989

Affirmed July 26, 1989

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Multnomah County, Charles S. Crookham, Judge.

James Waggoner, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Michael J. Gentry, Waggoner, Farleigh, Wada, Bogrand Georgeff, and Tooze, Marshall, Shenker, Holloway Duden, Portland.

Garry P. McMurry, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before Graber, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Edmonds, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


In this action to enforce an oral contract to make a will, the trial court found for plaintiff and imposed a constructive trust in her favor on the assets of the decedent's estate. The personal representative appeals. We affirm.

An oral contract to make a will is unenforceable, unless it was made before January 1, 1974. ORS 112.270. The issues on appeal are whether the evidence is clear and convincing that there was a contract and that it was entered into before that date, whether there is sufficient corroboration to satisfy the requirements of ORS 115.195, assuming that they apply, and whether plaintiff breached the contract. The trial court resolved those questions in plaintiff's favor.

We have read the transcript, examined the exhibits, and considered the arguments on appeal. On de novo review, we generally agree with the trial court's findings and conclusions. A detailed opinion would not add anything of significance to those findings or be of value to the bench or bar. We affirm the judgment.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Kent v. Brune

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 26, 1989
776 P.2d 882 (Or. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Kent v. Brune

Case Details

Full title:KENT, Respondent, v. BRUNE, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 26, 1989

Citations

776 P.2d 882 (Or. Ct. App. 1989)
776 P.2d 882