The All-Writs Act grants district courts the power, under certain circumstances, to enjoin parties from filing further lawsuits." MLE Realty Assocs. v. Handler, 192 F.3d 259, 261 (2d Cir. 1999); Kenny v. King, No. 15-cv-5642, 2015 WL 9050894, at *4 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 15, 2015); see also Matter of Hartford Textile Corp., 613 F.2d 388, 390 (2d Cir. 1979) (holding that the All Writs Act "grant[s] the district court power [s]ua sponte to enjoin further filings in support of frivolous and vexatious claims.") The district court has "an obligation to protect the public and the efficient administration of justice from individuals who have a history of litigation entailing vexation, harassment and needless expense to other parties and an unnecessary burden on the courts and their supporting personnel." Prince v. Dicker, 29 F. App'x 52, 55 (2d Cir. 2002) (quotations and citation omitted); see also Williams v. City Univ. ofNew York, Brooklyn College, ___ F. App'x ___, 2015 WL 8240286, at *2 (2d Cir. Dec. 9, 2015) (quoting Hong Mai Sa v. Doe, 406 F.3d 155, 158 (2d Cir. 2005)) ("If a litigant has a history of filing vexatious, harassing or duplicative lawsuits, courts may impose sanctions, including restrictions on future access to the judicial system."); Safir v. Unit