From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kenny v. Essman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 14, 1949
299 N.Y. 583 (N.Y. 1949)

Opinion

Argued February 29, 1949

Decided April 14, 1949

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, O'BRIEN, J.

William R. Meagher, Otis T. Bradley and Patrick J. Kearney for appellant.

Richard Formidoni and Leo M. Brimmer for respondents.


Judgments modified by reversing so much thereof as dismissed the second cause of action and by granting a new trial thereof, and as so modified, affirmed, with costs to abide the event. In our view, the evidence presented in connection with the second cause of action, predicated upon the defendants' "negligence" in maintaining the floor of their butcher shop "in a slippery and dangerous condition", was sufficient to require submission of that cause of action to the jury. No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, DESMOND, FULD and BROMLEY, JJ. CONWAY, J., concurs as to the second cause of action but dissents and votes to reverse as to the first cause of action and votes to grant a new trial as to that also on the opinion of Mr. Justice DORE in the Appellate Division. DYE, J., dissents and votes to affirm.


Summaries of

Kenny v. Essman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 14, 1949
299 N.Y. 583 (N.Y. 1949)
Case details for

Kenny v. Essman

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL KENNY, Appellant, v. LOUIS ESSMAN et al., Doing Business under the…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 14, 1949

Citations

299 N.Y. 583 (N.Y. 1949)
86 N.E.2d 106

Citing Cases

Toussaint v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.

Frankly, it is hard to see how that regulation differs from the common law standard. The failure to address a…