From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kennington v. Merit Systems Protection Bd.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Aug 26, 2011
2011-3192 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 26, 2011)

Opinion

2011-3192

08-26-2011

TERRY KENNINGTON, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. DE1221100502-W-1.

ON MOTION


ORDER

The Department of the Treasury moves to recaption to name the Merit Systems Protection Board as respondent.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The employing agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here, the Board dismissed Kennington's appeal for lack of juris- diction because it found that he failed to make a non-frivolous allegation that he made a protected disclosure under the Whistleblower Protection Act, 5 U.S.C. 2302 (b)(8). Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition for review.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above.

FOR THE COURT

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc: Terry L. Kennington

Dawn E. Goodman, Esq

Michael Carney, Esq.


Summaries of

Kennington v. Merit Systems Protection Bd.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Aug 26, 2011
2011-3192 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Kennington v. Merit Systems Protection Bd.

Case Details

Full title:TERRY KENNINGTON, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Aug 26, 2011

Citations

2011-3192 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 26, 2011)