From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kenner v. Forniss

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Apr 10, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv237-WHA (WO) (M.D. Ala. Apr. 10, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv237-WHA (WO)

04-10-2012

PRESTON KENNER, #136213, Plaintiff, v. LEON FORNISS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

No timely objection having been filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #5), entered on March 20, 2012, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The Plaintiff's claims against the Alabama Department of Corrections and Luther Strange are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii).

2. The Alabama Department of Corrections and Luther Strange are DISMISSED as Defendants in this case.

3. This case, with respect to the allegations set forth against Defendants Leon Forniss and Kim Thomas, are referred back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings.

________________________

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Kenner v. Forniss

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Apr 10, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv237-WHA (WO) (M.D. Ala. Apr. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Kenner v. Forniss

Case Details

Full title:PRESTON KENNER, #136213, Plaintiff, v. LEON FORNISS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 10, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv237-WHA (WO) (M.D. Ala. Apr. 10, 2012)