From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kennedy v. United States

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 20, 1930
44 F.2d 57 (9th Cir. 1930)

Opinion

No. 6148.

October 20, 1930.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Northern District of California; Adolphus F. St. Sure, Judge.

Proceedings by the United States to forfeit and condemn two 50-gallon drums of alcohol, opposed by Ronald C. Kennedy, claimant. From an adverse judgment, claimant appeals.

Affirmed.

Charles S. Wheeler, Jr., and Edmund F. Maher, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Geo. J. Hatfield, U.S. Atty., and Sol. A. Abrams, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal.

Before RUDKIN and WILBUR, Circuit Judges, and KERRIGAN, District Judge.


This was a proceeding by libel to forfeit and condemn two 50-gallon drums of alcohol, imported or brought into the United States from the Philippine Islands in violation of the Tariff Act (42 Stat. 858), and the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA).

The seizure of the alcohol was made upon land, after the arrival of the shipment at the port of San Francisco, not within the admiralty jurisdiction of the United States, and it is well settled in such cases that the proceeding for forfeiture is by action at law, triable by jury, unless a jury is waived in the manner prescribed by law. The Sarah, 8 Wheat. 391, 5 L. Ed. 644; Armstrong's Foundry, 6 Wall. 766, 18 L. Ed. 882; Confiscation Cases, 7 Wall. 454, 462, 19 L. Ed. 196; Morris' Cotton, 8 Wall. 507, 19 L. Ed. 481; Garnhart v. United States, 16 Wall. 162, 21 L. Ed. 275; Confiscation Cases, 20 Wall. 92, 22 L. Ed. 320; Shawnee Nat. Bank v. United States (C.C.A.) 249 F. 583; National Surety Co. v. United States (C.C.A.) 17 F.2d 372.

It is equally well settled that, if an action at law is tried by the court without a written waiver of a jury, the jurisdiction of the appellate court to review the judgment is limited to the process, pleadings, and judgment. This latter proposition is too firmly established to require citation of authority. See, however, United States v. McGovern (C.C.A.) 299 F. 302; Graver Corporation v. Hercules Gasoline Co. (C.C.A.) 16 F.2d 459; National Surety Co. v. United States, supra; Greer-Robbins Co. v. United States (C.C.A.) 19 F.2d 841. Here there was no waiver of a jury, by stipulation or otherwise.

The judgment must therefore be affirmed, and it is so ordered.


Summaries of

Kennedy v. United States

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 20, 1930
44 F.2d 57 (9th Cir. 1930)
Case details for

Kennedy v. United States

Case Details

Full title:KENNEDY v. UNITED STATES

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 20, 1930

Citations

44 F.2d 57 (9th Cir. 1930)

Citing Cases

People v. One 1941 Chevrolet Coupe

On appeal from a judgment in favor of the claimant, it was held that the action was one at law, triable by a…

Guiles v. United States

The property was all seized on land within Boundary County of the State of Idaho. The issues raised by the…