From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kennedy v. Kingsbury

Supreme Court of California
Jul 18, 1930
210 Cal. 667 (Cal. 1930)

Opinion

Docket No. L.A. 12147.

July 18, 1930.

PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel the Surveyor-General to issue a prospecting permit for gas and oil on certain tide lands. Writ denied.

Charles A. Son and Wilbert Morgrage for Petitioner.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and Charles A. Wetmore, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.


MEMORANDUM CASES.


THE COURT.

The questions presented in this case are identical with those presented in Kelley v. Kingsbury, (L.A. No. 12146), ante, p. 37 [ 290 P. 885], this day decided. [1] Upon the authority of that case the alternative writ is discharged, the prayer for a peremptory writ is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed.

Langdon, J., deeming himself disqualified, did not participate.


Summaries of

Kennedy v. Kingsbury

Supreme Court of California
Jul 18, 1930
210 Cal. 667 (Cal. 1930)
Case details for

Kennedy v. Kingsbury

Case Details

Full title:T.G. KENNEDY, Petitioner, v. W.S. KINGSBURY, Surveyor-General, etc.…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jul 18, 1930

Citations

210 Cal. 667 (Cal. 1930)
290 P. 886

Citing Cases

Nicolaysen v. Pacific Home

The meaning of the language of the contract seems clear, but if it can be considered doubtful or uncertain…