From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kennedy v. Jackson Cnty., Ark.

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Nov 18, 2024
3:24-cv-00180-JM-JJV (E.D. Ark. Nov. 18, 2024)

Opinion

3:24-cv-00180-JM-JJV

11-18-2024

JEREMY KENNEDY ADC #093061 PLAINTIFF v. JACKSON COUNTY, ARKANSAS; et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

On October 30, 2023, United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe submitted a Partial Recommended Disposition suggesting Defendants Rudisill and Nance be dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff's claims against them are barred by the Heck doctrine. (Doc. 12.) Thereafter, Plaintiff filed a Motion seeking permission to file a Third Amended Complaint: (1) abandoning his claims against Defendants Rudisill and Nance; (2) continuing his claims against Defendants Jackson County, Tubbs, Cooper, Huddleston, Clark, Sisk, and Dodson; and (2) adding a medical care claim against Dr. Darrell Elkin. (Doc. 15.) I find good cause for granting the Motion. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(2).

Therefore, Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint (Doc. 15) is GRANTED, and the Clerk shall file the proposed amended complaint (Doc. 15, Ex. 1) as Plaintiff Third Amended Complaint. The Partial Recommended Disposition (Doc. 12) is DECLINED as moot. Defendants Nance and Rudisill are DISMISSED without prejudice. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.


Summaries of

Kennedy v. Jackson Cnty., Ark.

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Nov 18, 2024
3:24-cv-00180-JM-JJV (E.D. Ark. Nov. 18, 2024)
Case details for

Kennedy v. Jackson Cnty., Ark.

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY KENNEDY ADC #093061 PLAINTIFF v. JACKSON COUNTY, ARKANSAS; et al…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Nov 18, 2024

Citations

3:24-cv-00180-JM-JJV (E.D. Ark. Nov. 18, 2024)