From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kennedy v. Encompass Indem. Co.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
Dec 9, 2011
C.A. No. N09C-06-271 MMJ (Del. Super. Ct. Dec. 9, 2011)

Opinion

C.A. No. N09C-06-271 MMJ

12-09-2011

JUDI KENNEDY, Plaintiff, v. ENCOMPASS INDEMNITY CO., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., Third-Party Defendant.


ORDER

The Court has considered Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. The Delaware Supreme Court's decision in State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Patterson, 7 A.3d 454 (Del. 2010), is controlling. This Court finds the facts and legal issues in the instant case to be indistinguishable from those in Patterson.

THEREFORE, Defendant Encompass Indemnity Company's Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby DENIED. To the extend Plaintiff Judi Kennedy can prove fault and damages, she is entitled to uninsured motorist benefits.

________________________

The Honorable Mary M. Johnston

See Kent v. Nationwide Property & Cas. Ins. Co., 844 A.2d 1092, 1098 (Del. Super. 2004) (cited favorably in Patterson, and holding that "plaintiff's claim is uninsured because there is no insurance applicable to the claim she asserts for noneconomic loss; there is no other security applicable.").


Summaries of

Kennedy v. Encompass Indem. Co.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
Dec 9, 2011
C.A. No. N09C-06-271 MMJ (Del. Super. Ct. Dec. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Kennedy v. Encompass Indem. Co.

Case Details

Full title:JUDI KENNEDY, Plaintiff, v. ENCOMPASS INDEMNITY CO., Defendant/Third-Party…

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

Date published: Dec 9, 2011

Citations

C.A. No. N09C-06-271 MMJ (Del. Super. Ct. Dec. 9, 2011)