From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kennedy v. Brago

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 28, 1989
544 So. 2d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 87-2724.

March 14, 1989. Rehearing Denied June 28, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Jack M. Turner, J.

Holland Knight and Richard Nichols and Marilyn Holifield, Miami, for appellants.

Preddy, Kutner, Hardy, Rubinoff, Brown Thompson, Miami, for appellees.

Before HUBBART and FERGUSON, JJ., and SCOTT, ROBERT, Associate Judge.


A judgment was entered on a jury verdict fixing the plaintiffs' damages at $26,000 as a result of an automobile collision which aggravated Mrs. Kennedy's pre-existing injuries. The Kennedys' single contention on appeal is that the trial court's exclusion of one of their medical experts constitutes reversible error.

After reviewing the record, we conclude that the proffered testimony — that there was a degeneration in Mrs. Kennedy's condition after the accident — was cumulative and therefore its exclusion was harmless. Crawford v. Shivashankar, 474 So.2d 873 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (any error in the exclusion of expert's medical opinion was harmless in that it would have been cumulative of the testimony of four other physicians); Aiken v. Miller, 298 So.2d 477 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); see also Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Estate of Castano, 544 So.2d 215 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (no showing that the limitation placed on the number of experts permitted to testify affected the jury verdict).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Kennedy v. Brago

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 28, 1989
544 So. 2d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Kennedy v. Brago

Case Details

Full title:GERDA L. KENNEDY AND ROBERT A. KENNEDY, HER HUSBAND, APPELLANTS, v. WALTER…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 28, 1989

Citations

544 So. 2d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Katos v. Cushing

The evidence excluded was essentially cumulative, and the admitted medical testimony challenged here was not…

Dade County v. Midic Realty, Inc.

In this case, the proffered testimony was cumulative and its exclusion was harmless. Kennedy v. Brago, 544…