From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kennedy Funding, Inc. v. Chapman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 3, 2011
Case No. C 09-01957 RS (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. C 09-01957 RS

11-03-2011

KENNEDY FUNDING, INC., a New Jersey Corporation, Plaintiff, v. NICHOLAS CHAPMAN, an individual; JIREH EDUCATIONAL MINISTRIES, a California non-profit corporation; NEWPORT AVALON INVESTORS, LLC, a California limited liability company; BRIAN D. EVANS, an individual; MANCEBO CORPORATION, a California Corporation; ARNE WAGNER, an individual; LAWRENCE S. THAL, an individual; REDGE MARTIN, an individual; VANGUARD FINANCIAL LTD., and DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive, Defendants NEWPORT AVALON INVESTORS, LLC, a California corporation, Counter-Claimant, v. KENNEDY FUNDING, INC., a New Jersey corporation, Counterclaim-Defendant. ARNE WAGNER, an individual; LAWRENCE S. THAL, an individual; REDGE MARTIN, an individual; and WAYNE REPICH, an individual; Counterclaimants v. KENNEDY FUNDING, INC., a New Jersey corporation, Counterclaim-defendant.


Michael S. Kogan (SBN 128500)

ERVIN COHEN & JESSUP LLP

Attorneys for Kennedy Funding, Inc.

ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS

ENTIRE COMPLAINT INCLUDING ALL

COUNTER CLAIMS AND CLOSE CASE

Date: [No Hearing Required]

Place: Courtroom 3, 17th Floor

Judge: The Honorable Richard Seeborg

WHEREAS, the Court having reviewed the Stipulation to Dismiss Entire Complaint Including All Counter Claims (the "Stipulation") entered into by and among Kennedy Funding, Inc. ("Kennedy" or "Plaintiff") and Nicholas Chapman ("Chapman"), JIREH Educational Ministries, Inc. ("JIREH"), Newport Avalon Investors LLC ("Newport", together with JIREH and Chapman, the "Chapman Defendants"), Lawrence S. Thai ("Thal"), Arne Wagner ("Wagner"), Redge Martin ("Martin"), Wayne Repich ("Repich"), Vanguard Financial Ltd. ("Vanguard," together with Thal, Wagner, Martin and Repich, the "Vanguard Defendants"), Brian D. Evans ("Evans") and Mancebo Corporation ("Mancebo," together with Evans, the "Mechanics Lien Defendants") (the Chapman Defendants, Vanguard Defendants, and the Mechanics Lien Defendants are the "Defendants" and the Defendants and the Plaintiff are the "Parties"), in which the Parties agreed as follows:

A. Dismiss Kennedy's second amended complaint (the "Complaint").

B. Dismiss Newport's Counter Claims Against Kennedy Funding Inc. (the "Newport Counter Claims").

C. Dismiss the Vanguard Defendants Counterclaim (the "Vanguard Counter Claims").

D. All Parties wish to avoid the expenditure of further costs and attorneys' fees to pursue their respective claims and defenses and have agreed to dismiss the Complaint, Newport Counter Claims and the Vanguard Counter Claims in its entirety, and all other matters concerning the Complaint.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The entire Complaint, Newport Counter Claims and the Vanguard Counter Claims, including all counter claims is dismissed, such that this case will be closed by the Court.

2. The Parties are each responsible for their own respective attorneys' fees and costs.

3. Nothing herein shall extinguish, prejudice or affect any claims or rights that the Vanguard Defendants, or any of them, have or may have against the Chapman Defendants or any of them.

RICHARD SEEBORG

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

Kennedy Funding, Inc. v. Chapman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 3, 2011
Case No. C 09-01957 RS (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Kennedy Funding, Inc. v. Chapman

Case Details

Full title:KENNEDY FUNDING, INC., a New Jersey Corporation, Plaintiff, v. NICHOLAS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Nov 3, 2011

Citations

Case No. C 09-01957 RS (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2011)