From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kennard v. Kernan

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 16, 2006
No. CIV S-05-2023 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-2023 FCD GGH P.

February 16, 2006


ORDER


Respondent seeks an extension of time to file a response to petitioner's habeas application, pursuant to an order filed on January 4, 2006. The request includes a lodged proposed order via ECF in .pdf format, but counsel has not included a proposed order via email in word processing format in accordance with the local rules. On this occasion, the court will grant respondent's request; however, in order for any future request to be considered, counsel must fully comply with Local Rule 5-137(b).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Respondent's February 6, 2006 request for an extension of time is granted and respondent has until March 8, 2006 to file a response to the petition;

2. Petitioner will have thirty days to file an opposition or a reply, as appropriate;

3. If a motion was filed and petitioner has filed an opposition, respondent will have fifteen days thereafter to file a reply; and

4. Any future request filed by counsel must fully comply with Local Rule 5-137(b).


Summaries of

Kennard v. Kernan

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 16, 2006
No. CIV S-05-2023 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2006)
Case details for

Kennard v. Kernan

Case Details

Full title:LONNIE KENNARD, Petitioner, v. SCOTT KERNAN, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 16, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-05-2023 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2006)