From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kenmark Motorsport Ltd. v. Burns

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Nov 24, 1998
985 S.W.2d 814 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 74048.

OPINION FILED: November 24, 1998. MOTION FOR REHEARING AND/OR TRANSFER TO SUPREME COURT DENIED: February 18, 1999. APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER DENIED: March 23, 1999.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CHARLES COUNTY, HONORABLE JON A. CUNNINGHAM, JUDGE.

William James O'Herin, Florissant, for appellant.

Kenneth T. Strong, St. Peters, Party Acting pro se.

Before Paul J. Simon, P.J., Kathianne Knaup Crane, J., and Lawrence E. Mooney, J.


ORDER


Defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to set aside a default judgment. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Kenmark Motorsport Ltd. v. Burns

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Nov 24, 1998
985 S.W.2d 814 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Kenmark Motorsport Ltd. v. Burns

Case Details

Full title:KENMARK MOTORSPORT LTD., PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT, v. MIKE BURNS…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Nov 24, 1998

Citations

985 S.W.2d 814 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

McElroy v. Eagle Star Group, Inc.

Therefore, when a party's Rule 74.05(d) motion to set aside a default judgment is filed after the underlying…