From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kendrid v. Cudjo

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 28, 2021
2:20-cv-02546 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-02546 JAM DB P

06-28-2021

FORREST KENDRID, Plaintiff, v. CUDJO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 25, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 25, 2021 (ECF No. 8), are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order (ECF No. 5) is denied.


Summaries of

Kendrid v. Cudjo

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 28, 2021
2:20-cv-02546 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Kendrid v. Cudjo

Case Details

Full title:FORREST KENDRID, Plaintiff, v. CUDJO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 28, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-02546 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)