From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kendrick v. Pina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 5, 2011
No. 1:08-CV-1055-RCC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2011)

Opinion

No. 1:08-CV-1055-RCC

08-05-2011

Owen Thomas Kendrick, Plaintiff, v. Lieutenant D. Pina, et al., Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On May 5, 2011, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's Amended Complaint for failure to exhaust his remedies, but granted Plaintiff leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. 35). Plaintiff did file a Second Amended Complaint on June 1, 2011. (Doc. 36). Defendants' time to file a responsive pleading or motion ran on August 1, 2011 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(2). To date, Defendants' have not responded to the Second Amended Complaint. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants show cause why the Court should not enter sanctions for failure to timely respond. Defendants' brief is due on or before August 18, 2011. If Defendants fail to comply with this Order, Plaintiff may be entitled to move for default judgment.

Raner C. Collins

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Kendrick v. Pina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 5, 2011
No. 1:08-CV-1055-RCC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Kendrick v. Pina

Case Details

Full title:Owen Thomas Kendrick, Plaintiff, v. Lieutenant D. Pina, et al., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 5, 2011

Citations

No. 1:08-CV-1055-RCC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2011)