Kenderski v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company

Full title: LEE M. KENDERSKI, Plaintiff, v. MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: May 8, 2008

CIVIL CASE NO. 07-10706 (E.D. Mich. May. 8, 2008)

Opinion

CIVIL CASE NO. 07-10706.

May 8, 2008

LAW OFFICE OF GLEN N. LENHOFF, BY: GLEN N. LENHOFF (P32610), ROBERT KENT-BRYANT (P40806), Attorney for Plaintiff, Flint, Michigan.

DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC BY: DAVID R. DEROMEDI (P42093), RYAN K. MULALLY (P61699), Attorney for Defendant, Detroit, Michigan.

GEORGE R. ASHFORD (P28317), Co-Counsel for Defendant, Detroit, Michigan.

ORDER

PATRICK DUGGAN, District JudgePage 2

This matter having come before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to exclude the sexual orientation of witnesses Marian Penley and Karen Pfenninger and to exclude the fact that Penley and Pfenninger live together, and the Court having heard the arguments of the parties and being fully advised in the premises:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion in Limine is GRANTED for the reasons stated on the Record on April 23, 2009. Defendant is, thus, barred from introducing evidence or eliciting testimony concerning the sexual orientation of Marian Penley and Karen Pfenninger and/or the fact that Penley and Pfenninger live together.

IT IS SO ORDERED.