From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kendall v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division
Jul 14, 2010
CASE NO. 5:09-CV-900061 (HL), CASE NO. 5:06-CR-47 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Jul. 14, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:09-CV-900061 (HL), CASE NO. 5:06-CR-47 (HL).

July 14, 2010


ORDER


Before the Court is MARTIN KENTRAE KENDALL'S motion for a Certificate of Appealabilty ("COA") from this Court's May 19, 2010 Order, which adopted the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation that Petitioner's Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1) motion be dismissed. (R. at 94, 97, 100).

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has held that a petitioner is required to obtain a COA to appeal the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion. Gonzalez v. Secretary for the Dep't of Corr. , 366 F.3d 1253, 1264 (11th Cir. 2004). Under § 2253(c), a COA may issue only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. For reasons stated in the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation and this Court's Order adopting the same, Petitioner has not made such a showing. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Accordingly, petitioner's motion for a COA is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kendall v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division
Jul 14, 2010
CASE NO. 5:09-CV-900061 (HL), CASE NO. 5:06-CR-47 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Jul. 14, 2010)
Case details for

Kendall v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN KENTRAE KENDALL, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division

Date published: Jul 14, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 5:09-CV-900061 (HL), CASE NO. 5:06-CR-47 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Jul. 14, 2010)