Opinion
3:10-CV-0535-ECR (VPC)
08-22-2011
THOMAS KEMPVANEE, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD SKOLNIK, et al., Defendants.
COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTES OF THE COURT
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK: LISA MANN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is plaintiff's motion to compel production of requested discovery or, in the alternative, for a show cause hearing (#27). Defendants opposed the motion (#35). No reply was filed.
Defendants state in their opposition that plaintiff was permitted to review the documents that are the subject of his motion to compel at Lovelock Correctional Center on July 14, 2011; therefore, his motion to compel is now moot. Plaintiff did not file a reply. Therefore, plaintiff's motion to compel production of requested discovery or, in the alternative, for a show cause hearing (#27) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By: __________________
Deputy Clerk