From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kemper v. Colo. Court of Appeals

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 18, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02264-LTB (D. Colo. Oct. 18, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02264-LTB

10-18-2012

GARY ALLEN KEMPER, Plaintiff, v. COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS, INDUSTRIAL CLAIM APPEALS OFFICE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, LPR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AND MILLER SAFETY, and STATE OF COLORADO ALS, Defendants.


ORDER IMPOSING FILING RESTRICTIONS

In an order filed on October 2, 2012, the Court dismissed this action and directed Plaintiff, Gary Allen Kemper, to show cause why certain filing restrictions should not be imposed. Mr. Kemper was warned that the specified filing restrictions would be imposed if he failed to show good cause within thirty days. Although Mr. Kemper submitted a Response to the Order to Show Cause, nothing he asserts shows good cause why the Court should not impose filing restrictions.

Therefore, as discussed in the October 2 Order, Mr. Kemper will be ENJOINED from filing any future pro se action in this Court that challenges the disposition of his State of Colorado worker's compensation claim and the associated 1994 injury that he incurred while working for LPR Construction Company. Mr. Kemper has attempted to challenge the State's denial of his worker's compensation claim in four separate actions, including this case. See Kemper v. LPR Construction Co., et al. No. 07-cv-01538-ZLW (D. Colo. Sept. 19, 2007), aff'd No. 07-1411 (10th Cir. Mar. 27, 2008); see also Kemper v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State of Colorado, et al., No. 03-cv-01801-ZLW (D. Colo. Oct. 6, 2003); Kemper v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State of Colo., No. 03-cv-01162-ZLW (D. Colo. July 3, 2003), aff'd, No. 03-1162 (10th Cir. Dec. 12, 2003).

This Court has the power to impose still further sanctions such as costs, attorney fees, and double costs for the filing of frivolous actions. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. Although the Court has not imposed such sanctions here, the Court reserves the right to do so if Mr. Kemper continues to submit repetitive and frivolous filings in this Court that challenge his 1994 injury and the associated worker's compensation claim. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Mr. Kemper is ENJOINED from filing any pro se action challenging the State of Colorado worker's compensation that involved the injury he incurred in 1994 while working at LPR Construction Company.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 18th day of October, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

________________________

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Kemper v. Colo. Court of Appeals

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 18, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02264-LTB (D. Colo. Oct. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Kemper v. Colo. Court of Appeals

Case Details

Full title:GARY ALLEN KEMPER, Plaintiff, v. COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS, INDUSTRIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 18, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02264-LTB (D. Colo. Oct. 18, 2012)