From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kemp v. Skolnik

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 13, 2010
2:09-CV-02002-PMP-LRL (D. Nev. Oct. 13, 2010)

Opinion

2:09-CV-02002-PMP-LRL.

October 13, 2010


ORDER


On October 7, 2010, Plaintiff Kemp filed a Supplemental Pleading to Motion for Enlargement of Time (Doc. #25). Plaintiff addresses a prior Motion (Doc. #23) filed October 1, 2010, which this Court granted (Doc. #24) on October 5, 2010.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that because the Court has already granted the relief request by Plaintiff in connection with his motions (Doc. #23), filed on October 1, 2010, Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion (Doc. #25) is DENIED as moot. Plaintiff Kemp shall have to and including October 22, 2010, within which to file an Amended Complaint as provided in this Court's Order (Doc. #24) entered October 5, 2010.

DATED: October 13, 2010.


Summaries of

Kemp v. Skolnik

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 13, 2010
2:09-CV-02002-PMP-LRL (D. Nev. Oct. 13, 2010)
Case details for

Kemp v. Skolnik

Case Details

Full title:KEITH KEMP, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD SKOLNIK, DWIGHT NEVENS, ISIDRO BACA…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Oct 13, 2010

Citations

2:09-CV-02002-PMP-LRL (D. Nev. Oct. 13, 2010)