From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kemp v. Skolnik

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 26, 2012
2:09-CV-02002-PMP-VCF (D. Nev. Apr. 26, 2012)

Opinion

2:09-CV-02002-PMP-VCF

04-26-2012

KEITH KEMP, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD SKOLNIK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On April 9, 2012, the Court entered an Order (Doc. #69) denying Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. #62) and directing that Plaintiff file a response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #65) not later than April 24, 2012. To date, Plaintiff has failed to comply with this Court's Order. As a result, Plaintiff consents to the granting of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Moreover, a review of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss shows that Defendants are entitled to the relief requested on the merits.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #65) is GRANTED and that the Clerk of Court shall forthwith enter judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff.

____________________________

PHILIP M. PRO

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Kemp v. Skolnik

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 26, 2012
2:09-CV-02002-PMP-VCF (D. Nev. Apr. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Kemp v. Skolnik

Case Details

Full title:KEITH KEMP, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD SKOLNIK, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 26, 2012

Citations

2:09-CV-02002-PMP-VCF (D. Nev. Apr. 26, 2012)