From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kemp v. Lawyer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 30, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01368-LTB-KMT (D. Colo. Aug. 30, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01368-LTB-KMT

08-30-2011

KEITH KEMP, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Jason Kemp, and CONNIE KEMP, individually, Plaintiffs, v. IVAN LAWYER, a Trooper fo the Colorado State Patrol, in his individual capacity, KIRK FIRKO, a Corporal of the Colorado State Patrol, in his individual capacity, CHAD DUNLAP, a Sergeant of the Colorado State Patrol, in his individual capacity, RALPH C. TURANO, Legal Training Attorney for the Colorado State Patrol, in his individual capacity, and JOHN DOE, employee of the Colorado State Patrol, in his/her individual capacity, Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoy a


Deputy Clerk, Nick Richards

Rebecca Teitelbaum Wallace

Paul G. Karlsgodt

Nathan A. Schacht

Erica Gann Kitaev

Cathy Havener Greer

Bernard Roland Woessner

Rachel Ann Morris

Michael Turner Lowe

Skippere Stewart Spear

Jack M. Wesoky

COURTROOM MINUTES / MINUTE ORDER

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Court in Session: 9:50 a.m.

Court calls the case. Appearances of counsel.

The Court hears discussion on Defendant Chad Dunlap's Motion for a Protective Order and to Stay Discovery Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(C)(1) [Doc. No. 38, filed August 15, 2011], Defendant Ralph C. Turano's Motion for a Protective Order and to Stay Discovery Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(C)(1) [Doc. No. 40, filed August 16, 2011], and Defendant Firko's Motion to Stay Proceedings [Doc. No. 50, filed August 26, 2011]. It is ORDERED: Defendant Dunlap's Motion for a Protective Order and to Stay Discovery [38] and Defendant Turano's Motion for a Protective Order and to Stay Discovery [40] are GRANTED in full. Discovery is stayed as to all four defendants at this time, with the exception of the John Doe defendants, pending ruling from Senior District Judge Lewis T. Babcock on the outstanding Motions to Dismiss with regard to defendant Dunlap and defendant Turano. It is ORDERED: Defendant Firko's Motion to Stay Proceedings [50] is DENIED as moot without prejudice. It is ORDERED: No Scheduling Order shall be entered in this matter at this time. Defendant Dunlap and defendant Turano are to file either a Joint Status Report or separate Status Reports 5 days after ruling from Senior District Judge Babcock regarding the status of the criminal proceedings against defendant Firko and defendant Lawyer.

Court in recess: 10:14 a.m.

Total In-Court Time: 00:24 Hearing concluded.

*To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119.


Summaries of

Kemp v. Lawyer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 30, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01368-LTB-KMT (D. Colo. Aug. 30, 2011)
Case details for

Kemp v. Lawyer

Case Details

Full title:KEITH KEMP, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 30, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01368-LTB-KMT (D. Colo. Aug. 30, 2011)