From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kemp v. Kemp

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 20, 2011
61 So. 3d 481 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. 5D09-3007.

May 20, 2011.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Julianne Piggotte, Judge.

Susanne D. McCabe, of Bonus McCabe, PLLC, Orlando, for Appellant.

Paul E. Rice, Jr., Rice Rose, P.A., Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


In this post-dissolution proceeding, we affirm the trial court's judgment of contempt in all respects, save one. Under prevailing law, the trial court must make findings to substantiate an award of attorney's fees to allow for meaningful appellate review. See DeLillo v. DeLillo, 848 So.2d 454, 455 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). When someone other than an attorney's own client is required to pay their fees, the trial court must award a reasonable fee, determined from testimony (absent any stipulations) as to the prevailing rates for attorneys in comparable circumstances and the amount of time reasonably expended by the attorney on the matter. See Franklin Marbin, P. A v. Mascola, 711 So.2d 46, 48-49 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); see also Fla. Patient's Comp. Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 1985). This determination requires the trial court to make findings of fact regarding the number of hours spent, and a reasonable hourly rate. Simpson v. Simpson, 780 So.2d 985, 988 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). Absent such factual findings, the award of attorneys' fees must be reversed and remanded for further proceedings. In all other respects, the judgement of contempt is affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

GRIFFIN and LAWSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kemp v. Kemp

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 20, 2011
61 So. 3d 481 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

Kemp v. Kemp

Case Details

Full title:Richard S. KEMP, Appellant, v. Ann Marie Dahl KEMP, n/k/a Ann Marie Welsh…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: May 20, 2011

Citations

61 So. 3d 481 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Citing Cases

Card v. Card

At first blush, therefore, the matching-amount provision was not determinative as to the fees payable to Ms.…