From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kemp v. City of Springfield

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE
Aug 9, 2011
Civil No. 10-6420-TC (D. Or. Aug. 9, 2011)

Opinion

Civil No. 10-6420-TC

08-09-2011

MARK ANDREW KEMP, Plaintiff, v, CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Thomas M Coffin has filed his Findings and Recommendation on June 29, 2011. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C: § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Judge Coffins Findings and Recommendation, The County defendants" motion to dismiss (#16) is allowed to the extent plaintiff's eighth claim is dismissed without prejudice to refile in an amended complaint within 20 days of the date of this order.

________________________________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Kemp v. City of Springfield

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE
Aug 9, 2011
Civil No. 10-6420-TC (D. Or. Aug. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Kemp v. City of Springfield

Case Details

Full title:MARK ANDREW KEMP, Plaintiff, v, CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE

Date published: Aug 9, 2011

Citations

Civil No. 10-6420-TC (D. Or. Aug. 9, 2011)